The rumor mill all over Apple’s 2014 products slate is in overdrive, so what can we assume for being a near-truth? Do you second-guess by following the
rumors or do you probe the underlying method? Earlier Peter Cohan posted around the
chance of an Apple Phablet, but in fact there are various far more solutions being touted on the market. I think they are really primarily wrong and that Apple AAPL -0.33%‘s serious programs
are coming into focus.
The rumors are: Apple will introduce a less expensive mobile phone in September and so they will can be found in a multitude of colors and plastic casings - to distinguish them in the iPhone. Apple will have a look at a $99.00 value tag. Apple will introduce an outsized twelve inch plus iPad. Apple will go in to Phablets. Apple is arranging on tripling the pixel density on its displays.
Can Apple Compete With Samsung In $46 Billion Phablet Industry? Peter Cohan Peter Cohan Contributor
With Waze, Google Signals Arrival Of New Enterprise Model Haydn Shaughnessy Haydn Shaughnessy Contributor
The supplier intelligence that generates some of these rumors (reported by Reuters between other folks), also suggests that Apple normally throws down false scents for reporters and competitors by asking suppliers for all kinds of hardware prior to settling on a ultimate solution specification.
Put simply, supplier rumors aren’t really worth a whole lot. Nevertheless Tim Cook, in his recent D11 interview hinted that there's customer demand to get a larger display size.
Cook has also been insistent though that a larger screen calls for trade-offs like a larger battery, and the similar is true of the extra vibrant show. Anyway, what Apple needs is usually to strengthen the Retina as opposed to, necessarily, make it larger. The rumor mill suggests it could do that with quantum dot technologies from 3M or by means of Sharp IGZO back panels. But I like Cook’s insistence that these all involve trade-offs and Apple is wrestling with what tends to make most sense to its prospects.
What Apple owns right now is actually a stable platform that it truly is about to disrupt with a new iOS design. It pays to become cautious around the iOS7 launch. It will likely be a cautious 12 months with 1 key disruptive innovation.
When you examine Apple’s underlying strategy and its patenting record then people clear lines I pointed out earlier come into focus.
Why would Apple launch a considerably more cost-effective telephone? That does not make any sense. Even a short journey down market is going to existing Apple which has a considerably larger local community to support, a single that downloads more totally free apps and is unlikely to get looking for other Apple solutions. True they've had a superb working experience with the iPad Mini, which means you can’t rule out one more iProduct created across the 2007 paradigm. But the iOS 7 launch suggests Apple really wants to move on.
A larger show? I believe Apple is hamstrung on displays. Go for IGZO back panels - Samsung owns a part of Sharp and will know about it (there’s already a rumor that Samsung is preparing to launch the first IGZO tablet, for no superior explanation than to get to start with). Go for PHOLEDs and so they need to have to negotiate with Samsung, who dominate OLED production. Go for quantum dot and Samsung is an investor in among the critical gamers. Apple has to do some major innovation in displays to avoid getting hog-tied by its rivals.
Apple continues to be occupied patenting flex-display technologies - you can select up on that thread here at Patently Apple.
In their patent filings Apple suggest their upcoming move is likely to be a comformable display - something that wraps throughout the wrist or which has other conforming characteristics (probably a display that is definitely visible from quite a few angles). Their patent filings also suggest that they are gearing up for any launch into monitoring and metrics within a major way perhaps incorporating the iWatch.
Yesterday I referenced a patent filing that covers the tracking of all kinds of physique motion. Apple looks like it can be set to move into wellness in a greater way, working with physique sensors, perhaps within the wrist but potentially even developed into sports activities apparel. It wouldn’t be the first time - Apple pioneered it in the sports activities shoe but has let the marketplace get ahead of it to date.
The two of people developments propose Apple may be far more considering deepening its relationship with its huge buyer base instead of extending it down into marketplace categories that can't afford to travel with it into new services.
The concept of the substantially more serious try to generate wearables productive is tempting also as a result of Google GOOG +0.51%‘s action. And here I believe we see Apple’s long-term strategy at operate.
The rumors are: Apple will introduce a less expensive mobile phone in September and so they will can be found in a multitude of colors and plastic casings - to distinguish them in the iPhone. Apple will have a look at a $99.00 value tag. Apple will introduce an outsized twelve inch plus iPad. Apple will go in to Phablets. Apple is arranging on tripling the pixel density on its displays.
Can Apple Compete With Samsung In $46 Billion Phablet Industry? Peter Cohan Peter Cohan Contributor
With Waze, Google Signals Arrival Of New Enterprise Model Haydn Shaughnessy Haydn Shaughnessy Contributor
The supplier intelligence that generates some of these rumors (reported by Reuters between other folks), also suggests that Apple normally throws down false scents for reporters and competitors by asking suppliers for all kinds of hardware prior to settling on a ultimate solution specification.
Put simply, supplier rumors aren’t really worth a whole lot. Nevertheless Tim Cook, in his recent D11 interview hinted that there's customer demand to get a larger display size.
Cook has also been insistent though that a larger screen calls for trade-offs like a larger battery, and the similar is true of the extra vibrant show. Anyway, what Apple needs is usually to strengthen the Retina as opposed to, necessarily, make it larger. The rumor mill suggests it could do that with quantum dot technologies from 3M or by means of Sharp IGZO back panels. But I like Cook’s insistence that these all involve trade-offs and Apple is wrestling with what tends to make most sense to its prospects.
What Apple owns right now is actually a stable platform that it truly is about to disrupt with a new iOS design. It pays to become cautious around the iOS7 launch. It will likely be a cautious 12 months with 1 key disruptive innovation.
When you examine Apple’s underlying strategy and its patenting record then people clear lines I pointed out earlier come into focus.
Why would Apple launch a considerably more cost-effective telephone? That does not make any sense. Even a short journey down market is going to existing Apple which has a considerably larger local community to support, a single that downloads more totally free apps and is unlikely to get looking for other Apple solutions. True they've had a superb working experience with the iPad Mini, which means you can’t rule out one more iProduct created across the 2007 paradigm. But the iOS 7 launch suggests Apple really wants to move on.
A larger show? I believe Apple is hamstrung on displays. Go for IGZO back panels - Samsung owns a part of Sharp and will know about it (there’s already a rumor that Samsung is preparing to launch the first IGZO tablet, for no superior explanation than to get to start with). Go for PHOLEDs and so they need to have to negotiate with Samsung, who dominate OLED production. Go for quantum dot and Samsung is an investor in among the critical gamers. Apple has to do some major innovation in displays to avoid getting hog-tied by its rivals.
Apple continues to be occupied patenting flex-display technologies - you can select up on that thread here at Patently Apple.
In their patent filings Apple suggest their upcoming move is likely to be a comformable display - something that wraps throughout the wrist or which has other conforming characteristics (probably a display that is definitely visible from quite a few angles). Their patent filings also suggest that they are gearing up for any launch into monitoring and metrics within a major way perhaps incorporating the iWatch.
Yesterday I referenced a patent filing that covers the tracking of all kinds of physique motion. Apple looks like it can be set to move into wellness in a greater way, working with physique sensors, perhaps within the wrist but potentially even developed into sports activities apparel. It wouldn’t be the first time - Apple pioneered it in the sports activities shoe but has let the marketplace get ahead of it to date.
The two of people developments propose Apple may be far more considering deepening its relationship with its huge buyer base instead of extending it down into marketplace categories that can't afford to travel with it into new services.
The concept of the substantially more serious try to generate wearables productive is tempting also as a result of Google GOOG +0.51%‘s action. And here I believe we see Apple’s long-term strategy at operate.
source:http://www.forbes.com/sites/haydnshaughnessy/2013/06/14/why-apple-should-press-delete-on-phablets-ipad-maxis-and-cheap-phones/?partner=yahootix
My twitter: https://twitter.com/dbuying1
My facebook: https://www.facebook.com/dbuying
My twitter: https://twitter.com/dbuying1
My facebook: https://www.facebook.com/dbuying
No comments:
Post a Comment